Extraction of Challenging Forensic Samples Using the MicroGEM DNA Extraction Kit
Lauren Chwatt, Pace University, Falyn Vega, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, James Prinston & Andrew Schweighardt, NYC Office of Chief Medical Examiner
DNA extraction is an essential but sometimes tedious process in forensic investigation that may require a significant investment of time and resources. Proteinase K has been an industry standard for DNA extraction for several decades due to its reliability of protein denaturation when performing an extraction. Some of the drawbacks of proteinase K are that its use requires multiple ionic detergents and washing steps, while only being active above 65 ̊C. Here, we analyze the potential of a new enzyme being used in DNA extraction known as forensicGEM by the manufacturer MicroGEM. This novel enzyme is temperature-dependent, which enables it to be compatible with mesophilic enzymes. The forensicGEM protocol offers complete DNA extraction in about 20 minutes in a single tube, thus limiting contamination, loss of sample, and working time -- ultimately increasing efficiency. One of the main attractions of forensicGEM is its ability to extract DNA from highly degraded samples, potentially leading to more complete STR profiles in samples where a profile may have previously been poor or unattainable by conventional extraction procedures. To assess the efficiency and potential uses of forensicGEM, we collected highly degraded tissue and bone samples and extracted DNA using the MicroGEM kit, altering different parameters such as incubation times, enzyme amount, bone preparation method, and post-extraction purification. We then compared the results of samples extracted with MicroGEM to the results of the same samples extracted with a standard organic extraction to assess whether this new technology could be utilized routinely on highly degraded samples. Half of the degraded samples extracted with MicroGEM had detectable DNA. The highest success rate was observed for bone samples. One tissue sample in particular yielded higher average peak heights when extracted with MicroGEM. No statistically significant pattern was apparent with respect to identifying superior MicroGEM optimization parameters. Success with bone profiling was notable given that there was much less sample input for MicroGEM (10 mg) compared to the organic extraction (2 g). An ancillary finding of this study is that the bone reparation method of scraping yielded higher DNA quantities and better quality profiles compared to samples treated with the standard method of milling. Since the initial results were promising, this new technology was utilized on remains from the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks from which no detectable DNA had been previously extracted. Ultimately, MicroGEM was able to yield a 22-locus and a 15-locus profile on two of these highly degraded samples. Future work will focus on further investigation of the bone scraping method for universal application, and continued optimization of experimental parameters in the MicroGEM extraction protocol.